Re: Fix incorrect comments in tuplesort.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Fix incorrect comments in tuplesort.c
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvpud80+5j0aRHCLcMV-C2zBmGHLyWNu6W+4a33SZVZLww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix incorrect comments in tuplesort.c  ("cca5507" <cca5507@qq.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 15:08, cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com> wrote:
> > Using "However" here indicates some exception to what's just been
> > said, but there is no longer an exception. To write about what the
> > 1024 is for, we might need to reverse engineer what that's for. I
> > assume it's something like "Clamp at 1024 elements to avoid excessive
> > reallocs of the array". Or perhaps that without the " of the array"
> > part.
>
> Agreed. I prefer without the " of the array" part.

OK. Done like that.  Thanks.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Consistently use palloc_object() and palloc_array()
Next
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Adding callback support for custom statistics kinds