Re: Why is parula failing? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Why is parula failing?
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvpNhN9D1dqwnQ1fyPU+_MMuHapZyhPJyb1PJpBWzKcjbA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is parula failing?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Why is parula failing?
Re: Why is parula failing?
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 15:48, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> Still no partition_prune failures on master since the compiler version
> change.  There has been one [1] in REL_16_STABLE. I'm thinking it
> might be worth backpatching the partition_prune debug to REL_16_STABLE
> to see if we can learn anything new from it.

Master failed today for the first time since the compiler upgrade.
Again reltuples == 48.

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-04-10%2000%3A27%3A02

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: broken JIT support on Fedora 40
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%