Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvoZr6baHqUzvPAqr9f4ehY7EMdfphKyR+hc8_mT9WR9ww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 10:02, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> BTW, shouldn't GenerationCheck be ifdef'd out if MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING
> isn't set?  aset.c does things that way.

Isn't it done in generation.c:954?

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change