Re: Wordsmith pgstat_relation.c header comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Wordsmith pgstat_relation.c header comment
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvoLLYBcwJG0BGmgt5B9ynxkcCSNdah6FARLh_0uJD_FNg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Wordsmith pgstat_relation.c header comment  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 21:52, Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was working on statistics and realized that the pgstat_relation.c header comment
> is mentioning "function relation" which does not look appropriate and probably a
> typo or copy/paste error in 13619598f108.

Yeah, looks like maybe someone pasted the "relation" over the wrong
word after a copy/paste from pgstat_function.c.

Pushed.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: anonymous unions (C11)
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore documentation and --create/--single-transaction limitation