On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:23, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> FWIW, I'd argue for dropping print_path rather than continuing to
> maintain it. I never use it, finding pprint() to serve the need
> better and more reliably.
Then perhaps we just need to open a thread with an appropriate subject
to check if anyone finds it useful and if we don't get any response
after some number of weeks, just remove it from master.
David
