On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 03:56, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So basically, we now have a hard restriction that hashaggs can't use
> more than INT_MAX kilobytes, or approximately 2.5GB, and this use case
> is getting eaten alive by that restriction. Seems like we need to
> do something about that.
Hmm, math check?
postgres=# select pg_size_pretty(power(2,31)::numeric*1024);
pg_size_pretty
----------------
2048 GB
(1 row)
David
