Re: Something is wrong with wal_compression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey Borodin
Subject Re: Something is wrong with wal_compression
Date
Msg-id CAAhFRxh+M8GJnk8srj3D3cF9XVy38xjRE9BqKH+4ekzk1iZhPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Something is wrong with wal_compression  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Something is wrong with wal_compression
Re: Something is wrong with wal_compression
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 3:04 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Indeed, it seems like this behavior makes pg_xact_status() basically
> useless as things stand.
>

If we agree that xid allocation is not something persistent, let's fix
the test? We can replace a check with select * from pg_class or,
maybe, add an amcheck run.
As far as I recollect, this test was introduced to test this new
function in 857ee8e391f.


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: improving user.c error messages
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Partition key causes problem for volatile target list query