Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey Borodin
Subject Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count
Date
Msg-id CAAhFRxgYvgZ-PNWoLtW-E=9cBLhMVDfdNeOtiSb5YvEZ6xntXg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:25 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:19:28AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > I hesitated to propose such a level of simplification, but basically I
> > was alsothinking the same thing.
+1

> Okay, fine by me to use one single message.  I'd rather still keep the
> three tests, though, as they check the three conditions upon which the
> error would be triggered.

PFA v8. Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher