Re: [HACKERS] Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paresh More
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id CAAgiCNEftgk-h3Lja0R3BxC+w97cTbYGQm9VmEUNSyO-xKLtNg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Alvaro,

I applied the patch which you mentioned and tried compiling  postgresql server for windows 32 and 64 and the results are:-

1) postgresql server(96) with tcl version 8.5 is compiling fine with out any issue.
2) postgresql server(10) snapshot with tcl version 8.6 is also compiling fine without any issue.






On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:


On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Something like the (untested) attached perhaps?

Looks plausible, I'm not in a position to test though.

Sandeep/Paresh - can you test please?
 
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



--

Thanks & Regards

Paresh More

NEW-EDB-logo-4c

Pune, India.

Cell :  +919922000564 |  www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error message on missing SCRAM authentication witholder clients
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Why type coercion is not performed for parameters?