Re: CLUSTERing a partition? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Dave Johansen
Subject Re: CLUSTERing a partition?
Date
Msg-id CAAcYxUcnxe-BBx633zovArsLLzN9YzA1jFzv0Xv+8DaW3t3bHg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTERing a partition?  (jaime soler <jaime.soler@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 4:26 AM, jaime soler <jaime.soler@gmail.com> wrote:
El vie, 13-03-2015 a las 16:33 -0700, Dave Johansen escribió:
> I'm using Postgres 8.4 and I would like to cluster a partition but
> keep running into issues with locks. CLUSTER requires an Exclusive
> Lock and so it gets "stuck behind" running queries that have a Share
> Lock on the partition even though they are not using the partition. I
> would be fine if the cluster waited until after the existing queries
> finished, but this then causes all new queries to back up behind it. I
> tried doing "NO INHERIT" to remove the partition while the cluster is
> happening, but that also requires an Exclusive Lock and runs into the
> same problem.
>
uff postgresql 8.4, are you from the past?
>
> So is there some way that I can CLUSTER a partition? I would be fine
> with removing the partition while the CLUSTER is happening, if that
> makes it possible.

There is a extension pg_repack http://pgxn.org/dist/pg_repack/1.3.1/ ,
that allows to retore order of a table without using a exclusive lock,
but i don't know how it behavior with partitioned tables.

Thanks for the info, but https://github.com/reorg/pg_repack/issues/23 scares me way too much to consider using it.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: standby parallel backup
Next
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: libs, compat and upgrades (oh my)