Re: Doc: Move standalone backup section, mention -X argument - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marlene Reiterer
Subject Re: Doc: Move standalone backup section, mention -X argument
Date
Msg-id CAAb-pUV97G=-yTqzLa3qr_9zS55gg5uBC7s3odoQrNojJ6xyVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Doc: Move standalone backup section, mention -X argument  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I compiled the patch and it worked without any problems.

I think the patch makes sense, because of the structure of the current
docs. It seems more logical to have this section in this part of the
documentation, where it is useful and not only described for another
chapter, because it won't even work with the current chapter it is
referenced in ("Continous Archiving and Point-in-Time Recovery
(PITR)").

I am still new to Postgres, so I can't tell whether it can be written
more detailed or not. But I really like it, that is in a more fitting
chapter in my opinion.


Regards,
Marlene Reiterer


Am Mo., 16. Sept. 2024 um 10:35 Uhr schrieb David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com>:
>
> A documentation comment came in [1] causing me to review some of our backup documentation and I left the current
contentand location of the standalone backups was odd.  I propose to move it to a better place, under file system
backups.
>
> Adding to commitfest.
>
> David J.
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwZ%3DWxdWJ6O66yQ9dnWTLO12p7h3HpfhowCj%2B0U_bNrzdg%40mail.gmail.com
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: sia kc
Date:
Subject: Re: A starter task
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow logical failover slots to wait on synchronous replication