Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Coleman
Subject Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date
Msg-id CAAaqYe_4160VMZBM4yF-02hm_xBK89HhdDSRJOuYDWbY9Xqyow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
List pgsql-hackers
> OK, so we have that now.  I suppose this spreadsheet now tells us which
> places are useful and which aren't, at least for the queries that you've
> tested.  Dowe that mean that we want to get the patch to consider adding
> paths only the places that your spreadsheet says are useful?  I'm not
> sure what the next steps are for this patch.

I wanted to note here that I haven't abandoned this patch, but ended
up needing to use my extra time for working on a conference talk. That
talk is today, so I'm hoping to be able to catch up on this again
soon.

James Coleman



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Antonin Houska
Date:
Subject: JSON parser discards value of string token
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Leakproofness of texteq()/textne()