Re: Teach predtest about IS [NOT] proofs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > I went ahead and committed 0001 after one more round of review
> >
> > statements; my bad).  I also added the changes in test_predtest.c from
> > 0002.  I attach a rebased version of 0002, as well as 0003 which isn't
> > changed, mainly to keep the cfbot happy.
>
> [ squint.. ]  Apparently I managed to hit ^K right before sending this
> email.  The missing line was meant to be more or less
>
> > which found a couple of missing "break"
>
> Not too important, but perhaps future readers of the archives will
> be confused.

I was wondering myself :) so thanks for clarifying.

Regards,
James Coleman