Re: Patroni vs pgpool II - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Allan Nielsen
Subject Re: Patroni vs pgpool II
Date
Msg-id CAAX5PrYT1oePOc5FfaRoc0pVR1Y4hH=KCyvzN5MgtgK8r0jrcw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patroni vs pgpool II  (Inzamam Shafiq <inzamam.shafiq@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi

I have used pg_auto_failover for quite some time which provides automatic failover with sync replication.
I did not have any issues yet and running around 30 clusters. 

Regards Allan

man. 3. apr. 2023 kl. 08.33 skrev Inzamam Shafiq <inzamam.shafiq@hotmail.com>:
Hi Guys,

Hope you are doing well.

Can someone please suggest what is one (Patroni vs PGPool II) is best for achieving HA/Auto failover, Load balancing for DB servers. Along with this, can you please share the company/client names using these tools for large PG databases?

Thanks.

Regards,

Inzamam Shafiq
--
Med venlig hilsen / With kind regards
Allan Nielsen

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Francisco Olarte
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: UPSERT in Postgres
Next
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: UPSERT in Postgres