Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Date
Msg-id CAAWbhmjNGogqd8Vb+HfuUKmkFC_Oyew=CmiobwkxxR-ykSuarQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 2:36 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:33:18 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> > I don't think this can be commited to 15. So I post the fixed version
> > then move this to the next CF.
>
> Then done. Thanks!

Hello! This patchset will need to be rebased over latest -- looks like
b74e94dc27f (Rethink PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_SMGRRELEASE) and 5c279a6d350
(Custom WAL Resource Managers) are interfering.

Thanks,
--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improving multi-column filter cardinality estimation using MCVs and HyperLogLog
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats