Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM
Date
Msg-id CAAWbhmgjieX6gC1+xtr90Vyf0sEHhpohCwmMg1LFrvVuSH1JWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:48 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Overall, +1 to tightening the language around the docs in this area.
>
> However, to paraphrase Stephen, I think the language, as currently
> written, makes the problem sound scarier than it actually is, and I
> agree that we should just inline it above.

How does v2 look? I more or less divided the current text into a local
section and a network section. (I'm still not clear on where in the
current text you're wanting me to inline a sudden aside on SCRAM; it
doesn't really seem to fit in any of the existing paragraphs.)

--Jacob

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_collation.collversion for C.UTF-8
Next
From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready