Re: PL/pgSQL 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Jacobson
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date
Msg-id CAASwCXf+kqzQ07ZO5P99FNMvACUfG+BYAvysD7q+PVdCpHv+zQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL 2  (Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@nosys.es>)
Responses Re: PL/pgSQL 2
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@nosys.es> wrote:
>     We are definitely worse. This is the problem, we only look to our own
> belly bottom (if this expression exists in English). All NoSQL scale
> *easily*, *transparently* beyond one node. Postgres doesn't. I'm not saying
> they don't suck at many many other things, or that some of them may be worse
> solution than the problem. But despite JSON/JSONB in pg is awesome, it's far
> far away from what we need to compete agains NoSQL in these regards.

So the discussion started out with a desire to improve PL/pgSQL. Now
somehow NoSQL and JSON is discussed in the same thread. Interesting.
Godwin's Law never fails :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2