On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is way how to do COBOL from plpgsql. I am against it. Start to develop
> new language what will support fast development, but it is wrong way for
> plpgsql - and It is out my interest
Are you saying COBOL by default update's one row and throws an error otherwise?
In what way could *not* changing the syntax of a standard UPDATE
command, but changing the *behaviour*, in plpgsql2, be deemed to be a
step in the COBOL direction?
I don't want a new language, I love plpgsql, I just want to love it a
bit more, I don't think I have to clarify on that any more.
