On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Tom Lane
<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
FWIW, I'm attracted to the all-similarly-named-functions-together
method, mainly because it dodges the problem of how to encode a
function's argument list into a filename. However, we're being
short-sighted to only think of functions here. What about operators?
Or casts? Those don't have simple names either.
Someone suggested to urlencode them. I think that's a quite good solution.
Personally, I don't have any user-defined operators or casts. Don't know
how common it is in general, but it must of course work for these as well.
