Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached - Mailing list pgsql-general

From James Sewell
Subject Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached
Date
Msg-id CAANVwEtYQe4k0T9mGtO2SEcLvHEF8BEE2B29A+EeNEQ35NM=Pw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached  (Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached  (James Sewell <james.sewell@jirotech.com>)
List pgsql-general


+1, I too like the idea. The patch doesn't seem to be doing any heavy
lifting, I think that much overhead should be acceptable.

I'm guessing this won't be back-patched? Is it possible to somehow read this information from a C function?

- James


The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: ssl_crl_file Certificate Revocation List doesn't work for postgresql 11
Next
From: Daniel Frey
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq: Which functions may hang due to network issues?