Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_bvstFNbTx6sjAw3qaVOFQKGfsfEdb52aTU5cjy7E16VA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 5:58 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 5:05 PM Melanie Plageman
> <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only remaining TODOs are described in the commit message.
> most critical one is that the reset message doesn't work.

v10 is attached with updated comments and some limited code refactoring

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend