Re: Reduce cleanup lock contention on standby replay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: Reduce cleanup lock contention on standby replay
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_bu-LVpuKUeWX56AcQR5eLkGvH2rRxF95zPvc0W09xNZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Reduce cleanup lock contention on standby replay  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 10:29 AM Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2026, 00:40 SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM,
> <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Patch 2: Skip cleanup lock on replay for freeze-only prune records
>
> That seems fine with me.

I'm planning to commit the heap_page_prune_and_freeze() part of patch
2 after beta 4 is tagged since I'd rather not backpatch to 17 but skip
19. The part adding info to heap2_desc() I could see committing to
master potentially but I don't think makes sense to backpatch.

- Melanie



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Race conditions in logical decoding