Re: trivial designated initializers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: trivial designated initializers
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_bMLz3PLcQFGnm6rcL9pg4g45OnUHMkgM2=k-_yF7i0ew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to trivial designated initializers  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
Responses Re: trivial designated initializers
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 7:21 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
>
> We use C99 designated struct initializers in many places, but for some
> reason we don't do it in the tupleLockExtraInfo array in heapam.c nor in
> InternalBGWorkers array in bgworker.c.  I've had this trivial patch
> rotting in a worktree for a long time.  Any opposition to this change?

I find these much easier to understand with the designated
initializers (and I am a big fan of designated initializers in
general). So +1

- Melanie



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX support
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX support