Re: pgbench with partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: pgbench with partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_bFO4bxz+hkWu5YpGTS5HdogBDcr1Vaiw3f-MjnnRTkWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Responses Re: pgbench with partitioned tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 2:27 PM Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> pgbench_accounts is the only table that should grow to
> the point where partitioning can benefit the tpcb-like
> benchmark.

pgbench_history is append-only, so I could see the argument for
partitioning that.

> IMO, If there is a good reason to allow the other pgbench
> tables to be partitioned, that may be better to think
> about. I am not sure there is though.

see this thread [1] proposing partitioning pgbench_history last year.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAKRu_Zo8ST-Qk8VQ4KFkbMQcqJsQQz5r%2BYRRbecS3avgkoZhw%40mail.gmail.com#ca9397c201ed483cb02f07dcaaa2773c



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs