Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_bAfvo84NKPRT--wUdV5YtHaYqo1=-QiKkiaDSjDPB9hg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 3, 2026 at 2:47 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some ideas I had that I didn't include in v4-0003 because its Andres
> patch and is subjective:

I was just looking at another patch and realized test_read_stream.c
exists. I wonder if any of the code this patch set adds to test_aio.c
should be there? On the one hand the foreign IO test is testing AIO
behavior and not really read stream behavior even though it invokes
the read stream. So maybe it doesn't really belong in
0004_read_stream.pl?  The repeated blocks test is more of a read
stream test. Anyway, just a thought I had.

- Melanie



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: UBSAN crash in EventTriggerCollectAlterTSConfig (memcpy with NULL src)
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: enhance wraparound warnings