Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_YAB-vpp8Nd21=YSfu99arGTpfid+fK8k0gzo9kE-Sssw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:57 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Hi,

I wanted to take a look at this thread and do a review, but it's not
very clear to me if the recent patches posted here are independent or
how exactly they fit together. I see

1) hashagg-20200212-1.patch (2020/02/13 by Jeff)

2) refactor.patch (2020/02/13 by Jeff)

3) v1-0001-aggregated-unaggregated-cols-together.patch (2020/02/14 by
    Melanie)

I suppose this also confuses the cfbot - it's probably only testing (3)
as it's the last thing posted here, at least I think that's the case.

And it fails:

nodeAgg.c: In function ‘find_aggregated_cols_walker’:
nodeAgg.c:1208:2: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement]
   FindColsContext *find_cols_context = (FindColsContext *) context;
   ^
nodeAgg.c: In function ‘find_unaggregated_cols_walker’:
nodeAgg.c:1225:2: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement]
   FindColsContext *find_cols_context = (FindColsContext *) context;
   ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
<builtin>: recipe for target 'nodeAgg.o' failed
make[3]: *** [nodeAgg.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....


Oops! Sorry, I would fix the code that those compiler warnings is
complaining about, but that would confuse the cfbot more. So, I'll let
Jeff decide what he wants to do about the patch at all (e.g. include
it in his overall patch or exclude it for now). Anyway it is trivial
to move those declarations up, were he to decide to include it.

--
Melanie Plageman

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Extracting only the columns needed for a query
Next
From: Yugo NAGATA
Date:
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance