On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 12:59 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 12:40:25PM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> > Just a quick question regarding the naming conventions. It looks like
> > we have a choice between two options for consistency. Should we rename
> > the pg_lsn_in_internal function by replacing "_internal" with "_safe",
> > or should we rename all of the *_opt_error functions by replacing
> > "_opt_error" with "_internal"?
> >
> > I would choose the latter option.
>
> Applying "_safe" seems a bit more consistent to me, as per past
> changes like ccff2d20ed96, also looking at the functions that are
> given a ErrorSaveContext in input. I am ready to believe that there
> are not a lot of callers of the existing _opt_error() routines listed
> in numeric.h, so a renaming may be better to let existing callers know
> about the change. These predate the introduction of the "_safe"
> functions, introduced in 16d489b0fe05.
Understood, thanks.
The updated version is attached. In addition to the *_opt_error()
functions, it also renames pg_lsn_in_internal to pg_lsn_in_safe and
incorporates soft error handling.
Regards,
Amul
