Home > mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	amul sul
Subject	Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Date	September 14, 2017 14:58:49
Msg-id	CAAJ_b97-Kozgn0xZ5wTCrUJ5NDev3vcjGHFCOAOMTVhrQur_xw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
Responses	Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>) Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi Amul,

On 09/08/2017 08:40 AM, amul sul wrote:
Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA.

This patch needs a rebase.

Thanks for your note.

Attached is the patch rebased on the latest master head.

Also added error on

creating

efault partition

for the hash partitioned table

and updated document &

test script for the same.

Regards,

Amul

Attachment

0001-hash-partitioning_another_design-v19.patch

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Mithun Cy
Date: 14 September 2017, 14:53:40
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData()

From: Amit Langote
Date: 14 September 2017, 15:01:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE insteadof UNBOUNDED for range partition b

Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Attachment

Previous

Next