Home > mailing lists

index sizes: single table vs partitioned - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Andrew Hammond
Subject	index sizes: single table vs partitioned
Date	August 8, 2011 17:39:04
Msg-id	CAAC-ZNW_qwO95twmQrM7dx1vco7QLHpFF=Z2y9-3BnW9KLrgeg@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw
Responses	Re: index sizes: single table vs partitioned
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

For a large table, should there be a difference in index sizes between a single table representation and representation based on multiple partitions with identical indexes?

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Robert Haas
Date: 08 August 2011, 17:36:32
Subject: Re: [RFC] Common object property boards

From: Robert Haas
Date: 08 August 2011, 17:50:46
Subject: Re: fstat vs. lseek

index sizes: single table vs partitioned - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next