Re: Key joins - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Henson Choi
Subject Re: Key joins
Date
Msg-id CAAAe_zD0e5pK3YQPYx+YEhvDnZknZNTJ6F4rtOygALWVHf3XDg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Key joins  (Arne Roland <arne.roland@malkut.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Arne,

Thank you for the thorough and thoughtful response. As you suggested:

> "You can read more about our design rationale in chapter 8 in the
> attached key_joins.pdf or online at https://keyjoin.org/#sec8. For an
> understanding of the usefulness of the feature I suggest sections 7.2
> to 7.6 again in the key_joins.pdf or online at https://keyjoin.org/#sec7.2."

I will read through these sections carefully and come back with further
comments.

I genuinely admire the ambition of bringing this to WG3. Pushing a
Change Proposal to the SQL standard is no small undertaking, and I
respect the effort behind it. I hope the Stockholm meeting goes well.

On a personal note — I work on PostgreSQL upstream contributions myself,
and I have long been interested in the SQL standard as a living
document rather than a fixed reference. If I ever reach the point of
wanting to raise a small question or propose a correction based on
something I encounter in implementation work, would it be alright to
reach out to you?

Best regards,
Henson

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: hashjoins vs. Bloom filters (yet again)
Next
From: Henson Choi
Date:
Subject: Re: IGNORE/RESPECT NULLS can be specified for (prokind == 'f').