Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sami Imseih
Subject Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage
Date
Msg-id CAA5RZ0vSXSEupPyVpgD6yynHS15Uq2=gY5B-x7u6PmoKWqEeUQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Maybe we could also add a comment in multixact.c to update the doc accordingly if
> the computation changes? (I think that will be easy to miss).

Thanks for the comments!

I rather we not touch the .c file for this update. It's unlikely the actual
computation will change.

Regards,

Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Suraj Kharage
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for NO INHERIT to INHERIT state change with named NOT NULL constraints
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Extend postgres_fdw_get_connections to return remote backend pid