Re: Clean up NamedLWLockTranche stuff - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sami Imseih
Subject Re: Clean up NamedLWLockTranche stuff
Date
Msg-id CAA5RZ0vPWNMvTBqyH7nqDRrHd6Y4Et5iNqXFuwpbsPOk3cL4rQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Clean up NamedLWLockTranche stuff  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Committed with that little change, thanks!

Thanks!

I think there is one more comment cleanup in lwlock.c

 /*
- * This points to the main array of LWLocks in shared memory.  Backends inherit
- * the pointer by fork from the postmaster (except in the EXEC_BACKEND case,
- * where we have special measures to pass it down).
+ * This points to the main array of LWLocks in shared memory.
  */

we no longer need to take special measures to pass down MainLWLockArray
through the BackendParameters.

--
Sami

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-level pg_datum_image_equal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add "format" target to make and ninja to run pgindent and pgperltidy