> > what do you think of this? I think we should set fsync = on
> > at least for the part of the test that proceeds the 2 checkpoints and
> > set if back to off at the end of the tests for fsync stats. It is concerning
> > the tests for the fsync stats are not being exercised in
> > the buildfarm.
>
> One thing I fear here is the impact for animals with little capacity,
> like PIs and the like. On the other hand, I could just switch one of
> my animals to use fsync = on on at least one branch.
Yes, there should be some tests running for these stats,
so if it's possible to enable fsync on one or a few animals, that
will be better than nothing.
--
Sami