> I guess that may be how the current wording came from. But it seems a bit indirect to describe it that way, because
theweight itself does not determine if autovacuum would vacuum or analyze the table.
>
> Rewriting the doc more broadly would be a larger change. This small patch is only meant to avoid the confusion shown
bythe test earlier, where the score is equal to the weight but do_vacuum is false.
Hi,
Thanks for reporting. I took a look and agree with your doc changes.
do_vacuum/do_analyze will not be true for cases where the
individual component scores are less than or equal to the weight.
The patch LGTM
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
