>> It will be good to add more commentary here to the next person adding
>> a test, and mention
>> that only stable values should be included in this view. what do you think?
>
>
> I added a comment, but I don't think a test writer would be confused for long if they did break that rule.
Thanks! it looks like you added the additional comment to 0002 rather than 0001
which introduced the view. I fixed that in the attached.
>> + (references <link
>> linkend="catalog-pg-class"><structname>pg_statistic_ext</structname></link>.<structfield>stxrelid</structfield>)
>
>
> Fixed catalog-pg-attribute and catalog-pg-statistic-ext
A few references were missed in 0002.
+ <row>
+ <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition">
+ <structfield>expr_attnum</structfield> <type>int2</type>
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ Synthetic attnum used to reference this expression in
+ <link
linkend="catalog-pg-class"><structname>pg_statistic_ext</structname></link>.<structfield>stxdndistinct</structfield>
+ and
+ <link
linkend="catalog-pg-class"><structname>pg_statistic_ext</structname></link>.<structfield>stxddependencies</structfield>
+ </para></entry>
+ </row>
Also fixed in v7
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)