On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The CF finishing soon, I have done a first pass on the patches
>> remaining on it, moving patches to the next CF or updating them. There
>> are still 48 patches still on the tracker when writing this email:
>> Needs review: 32.
>> Ready for Committer: 16.
>> This requires a certain amount of energy to classify, so if you would
>> like spare a bit of HP/MP to the CFM, feel free to cleanup your
>> patches or the ones you are reviewing.
>>
>> @all: If I have updated your patch in a state that you think is not
>> appropriate, feel free to complain on the thread of the patch or here.
>> That's fine.
>
> After 3 days and 90 patches spamming everybody on this -hackers, the
> CF is now *closed*. Here is the final score of this session:
> Committed: 58.
> Moved to next CF: 70.
> Rejected: 4.
> Returned with Feedback: 23.
> Total: 155.
>
> It is nice to see that many people have registered as reviewers and
> that much has been done. I have finished with the impression that
> there has been more commitment in this area compared to the past.
> Thanks to all the people involved!
>
Many thanks to you for running the show. I think it might be okay if
one consolidated mail is sent for all the patches that are marked
"Returned with Feedback" or "Rejected" or "Moved to next CF". OTOH,
there is some value in sending a separate mail for each patch so that
people can argue on the decision by CFM for one particular patch, but
not sure if it worth.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
