Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP)
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LrUed_=L+ZP7zgLNMAXd3uhRgKiiJp2EWm+SJGqORkVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP)  (Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP)  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP)  (Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com> wrote:
> On 30 June 2014 22:50, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
>
> >I didn't find a related message.
> >?
>
> I think there have been some confusion, the design idea were never rejected but yes there were few feedback/ concern, which I had clarified. Also some of the other concerns are already fixed in latest patch.

Simon has mentioned that exactly this idea has been rejected at
PGCon 2 years back. Please refer that in below mail:

As far as I can see, you never came back with the different solution.

Have you checked the discussion in Developer meeting notes. Please
check the same at below link:


> So I wanted to have this patch in commitfest application, so that we can have a healthy discussion and rectify all the issues.
> But now I see that this patch has already been moved to rejected category, which will put break on further review.

I believe ideally this patch should have been marked as
"Returned with feedback" as you already got a feedback long
back and never come up with solution for same.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: inherit support for foreign tables
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA statement