On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Amit Kapila <
amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <
robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On the whole, I'm inclined to think that the XTM-based approach is
> > probably more useful and more general, if we can work out the problems
> > with it. I'm not sure that I'm right, though, nor am I sure how hard
> > it will be.
> >
>
> If I understood correctly, then the main difference between 2PC idea
> used in this patch (considering we find some way of sharing snapshots
> in this approach) and what is shared in slides is that XTM-based
> approach
>
Read it as DTM-based approach.
