Re: backup manifests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: backup manifests
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LiEwGtO7sq+6XeXGKTKgQi24uGqACfi5CQbj0nOYZ+gw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup manifests  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: backup manifests  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:28 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 08:42:35PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > But it feels clear that the name pg_validatebackup is not going
> > over very well with anyone. I think I should rename it to
> > pg_validatemanifest.
>
> Between those two, I would use "pg_validatebackup" if there's a fair chance it
> will end up doing the pg_waldump check.  Otherwise, I would use
> "pg_validatemanifest".
>

+1.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - add \aset to store results of a combined query