Re: Added missing copy related data structures to typedefs.list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Added missing copy related data structures to typedefs.list
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Lg9xzrYofaTA9uMFbonyU3Co5Asttm8ER7NSjeHvzumg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Added missing copy related data structures to typedefs.list  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Added missing copy related data structures to typedefs.list
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 9:16 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 4:28 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec  7, 2020 at 01:56:50PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Added missing copy related data structures to typedefs.list, these
> > > data structures were added while copy files were split during the
> > > recent commit. I found this while running pgindent for parallel copy
> > > patches.
> > > The Attached patch has the changes for the same.
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > Uh, we usually only update the typedefs file before we run pgindent on
> > the master branch.
> >
>
> Ok, Thanks for the clarification. I was not sure as in few of the
> enhancements it was included as part of the patches.
>

Yeah, I do that while committing patches that require changes in
typedefs. It is not a norm and I am not sure how much value it adds to
do it separately for the missing ones unless you are making changes in
the same file they are used and you are facing unrelated diffs due to
those missing ones.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Luc Vlaming
Date:
Subject: Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions
Next
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting