On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 11:29 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Amit, Ashutosh,
>
> > Thanks for the analysis. I think we should go with the simple patch
> > proposed in this thread to improve this test and that too only for
> > HEAD.
>
> To confirm, are you suggesting something like attached? It initially creates MVs
> on both instances, then ensure REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW won't be replicated.
> It also fixed the issue reported by Грем.
>
What difference REFRESH will make instead of CREATE? I think it is
okay to just patch what is posted by the reporter in the first email
[1] in this thread.
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANV9Qw5HD7%3DFp4nox2O7DoVctHoabRRVW9Soo4A%3DQipqW5B%3DTg%40mail.gmail.com
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.