Re: WAL usage calculation patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LSMizxbWKJgKr74h9eEeatEvQy5YVjO+jvL4qvgda2LA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL usage calculation patch  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:19 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Your patch looks mostly good to me.  I have made slight modifications
> > > > which include changing the non-text format in show_wal_usage to use a
> > > > capital letter for the second word, which makes it similar to Buffer
> > > > usage stats, and additionally, ran pgindent.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know what do you think of attached?
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot Amit.  It looks perfect to me!
> > >
> >
> > Pushed.
>
> Thanks!
>

I have updated the open items page to reflect this commit [1].

[1] - https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_13_Open_Items

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8) operators
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?