Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LQ9JrJJqRdCzMZXZqxWimi4RM8Phd6mz3=osLf4cxo5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction  (Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction  (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql@gmail.com> wrote:

> This looks like it's squashed one of the very fundamental buffer
>  scaling issues though; well done Amit.  

Thanks.

> I'll go back to my notes and try to recreate the pathological cases
> that plagued both the 8.3 BGW rewrite and the aborted 9.2 fsync
> spreading effort I did; get those running again and see how they 
> do on this new approach.  I have a decent sized 24 core server
> that should be good enough for this job.  I'll see what I can do.

It will be really helpful if you can try out those cases.


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres code for a query intermediate dataset
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction