Re: Replication slot stats misgivings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LE-aeiee=6Tf1pHU_sAGbLNDM_pnnEQ1jD7QHe67r0=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication slot stats misgivings  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:22 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:46:35PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 1:13 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > Thank you for updating the patch.
> > >
> > > I have one question on the doc change:
> > >
> > > +        so the counter is not incremented for subtransactions. Note that this
> > > +        includes the transactions streamed and or spilled.
> > > +       </para></entry>
> > >
> > > The patch uses the sentence "streamed and or spilled" in two places.
> > > You meant “streamed and spilled”? Even if it actually means “and or”,
> > > using "and or” (i.g., connecting “and” to “or” by a space) is general?
> > > I could not find we use it other places in the doc but found we're
> > > using "and/or" instead.
> > >
> >
> > I changed it to 'and/or' and made another minor change.
>
> I'm suggesting some doc changes.  If these are fine, I'll include in my next
> round of doc review, in case you don't want to make another commit just for
> that.
>

I am fine with your proposed changes. There are one or two more
patches in this area. I can include your suggestions along with those
if you don't mind?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance degradation of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15