On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> I've marked the CF entry closed. However, I'm not sure if we're quite
>>>> done with this thread. Weren't we going to adjust nbtree and hash to
>>>> be more aggressive about labeling their metapages as REGBUF_STANDARD?
>
>>> I have already posted the patches [1] for the same in this thread and
>>> those are reviewed [2][3] as well. I have adjusted the comments as per
>>> latest commit. Please find updated patches attached.
>
>> Confirmed. Setting those makes sense even if REGBUF_WILL_INIT is set,
>> at least for page masking.
>
> Thanks, I'd forgotten those patches were already posted. Looks good,
> so pushed.
>
> Looking around, I noted that contrib/bloom also had the disease of
> not telling log_newpage it was writing a standard-format metapage,
> so I fixed that too.
>
Thanks, Michael and Tom for reviewing and committing the work.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
