Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1L=qzRHPEn+qeMoKQGFBzqGoLBzt_ov0A89iFFiut+ppA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:40 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 10:09 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> > I gather we agree on what to do for v16, which is good.
>
> I have committed the patches.
>

Do we want the initial sync to also respect 'run_as_owner' option? I
might be missing something but I don't see anything in the docs about
initial sync interaction with this option. In the commit a2ab9c06ea,
we did the permission checking during the initial sync so I thought we
should do it here as well.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yurii Rashkovskii
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16