Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1L8QYw9HwBhF32b=nCtn-XcHSo-=1qnNJsPwtJMYsCBfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 4:41 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:07 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> >
> I have tested this on HEAD. It would be great if you can verify in
> back branches as well. I'll also do it before commit.
>

I am planning to push this tomorrow after doing testing on
back-branches. Let me know if you have any comments.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Domagoj Smoljanovic
Date:
Subject: pg_restore causing deadlocks on partitioned tables
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: TDE (Transparent Data Encryption) supported ?