Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1L05i2ErnPnQ_4US8OYU8devgfcx9p+vkRijYtjNj09vw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So I'd like to propose to keep the backward compatibility fully for s_s_names
>> (i.e., both "standby_list" and "N (standby_list)" mean the priority method)
>> at the first commit, then continue discussing this and change it if we reach
>> the consensus until PostgreSQL 10 is actually released. Thought?
>
> +1 on that.
>

+1.  That is the safest option to proceed.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Broken SSL tests in master
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.