Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1L-wO8xWuFvDGtKs__bqTSRFSX1wcExBhi4PTpzU4-Ahg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Dilip kumar <dilip.kumar@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12 September 2014 14:34, Amit Kapila Wrote
>
> > >Please find updated patch to include those documentation changes.
> >
> >  
> >
> > Looks fine, Moved to Ready for committer.
>
> Thanks a lot for the review.


This patch is in "Ready for committer" stage for more than 1.5 months.
I believe this is an important functionality such that without this tar
format of pg_basebackup is not usable on Windows.  I feel this
will add a value to pg_basebackup utility and moreover the need
and design has been agreed upon the list before development.

Can any Committer please have a look at this patch? 

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Change in HEAP_NEWPAGE logging makes diagnosis harder
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X