Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patchfor hash index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patchfor hash index
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KzpuShjxoPBfdUe7or5Wu0yOpRVN6yExCgPYnZcEifYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patchfor hash index  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Valid point, I think on split we should always transfer locks from old
>> > bucket to new bucket.
>> >
>>
>> Attached patch changes it as per above suggestion.
>
>
> OK.  Now patch looks good for me.
>

Thanks, I have marked the patch as RFC in CF app.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: samuel cherukutty
Date:
Subject: Clarification needed for comment in storage/file/fd.c
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [submit code] I develop a tool for pgsql, how can I submit it